DEM REP: WOMEN SHOULD SERVE IN COMBAT, BUT SHOULDN’T USE ASSAULT WEAPONS

DEM REP: WOMEN SHOULD SERVE IN COMBAT, BUT SHOULDN’T USE ASSAULT WEAPONS

Sorry folks but you simply cannot make this up. No way in hell can anyone in their right mind do something this incredibly stupid, IMHO anyway.

The following commentary is from my friend and shipmate, Amy-Beth Davis.

YOU JUST CAN’T FIX STUPID. GREAT GOOGLY MOOGLY….

YES – BY ALL MEANS… let’s put women in combat roles, but “under-arm” them because THEY CAN’T HANDLE IT??????

What the fuck is wrong with these people?

LIBERALISM IS A MENTAL DISORDER.

Posted from Wolf….

“This…this…this is hilarious to me. Women’s equality takes a HUGE step forward with being allowed in combat, only to get kicked in the ovaries by this ladies comments. What’s your thoughts on this ladies?? – Wolf

– On the very same day that Defense Secretary Leon Panetta lifted the ban on women serving in active combat zones, a Democratic congresswoman from New York argued that assault weapons are actually difficult for women to handle and should therefore be banned.

Rep. Carolyn McCarthy — a strong proponent for women serving in military combat roles — appeared on CNN’s Piers Morgan Tonight Thursday to make the case for Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s assault weapons ban. To that end, McCarthy argued that women should use traditional rifles rather than assault rifles because the former would would be “easier for a woman” to use.

Advertisements

You may fire when ready, Gridley

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s